01JAQ97SQBSFEKRPGBN0E20A8H-thumb1262x760

Pre-COP29 analysis: Revealing the injustice in climate finance

At COP29, the spotlight is on climate finance. Yet, setting ambitious targets is only part of the solution. To genuinely tackle the climate crisis, the funding must reach the world’s most vulnerable countries and frontline communities. Despite pledges, current climate finance is far from equitable and there is un urgent need for a fairer approach. 

As COP29 approaches in Baku, Azerbaijan, Swedwatch and other civil society organisations join calls by low- and middle-income countries to prioritize a just climate finance goal (officially known as the New Collective Quantified Goal – NCQG), that meets their immense costs of climate action. The UN’s Standing Committee on Finance estimates that low- and middle-income countries alone will need at least $5.8 trillion by 2030 to fulfill their climate goals and adaptation needs, as outlined in their Nationally Determined Contributions.

“Despite minimal carbon footprints, low-income countries face the most severe impacts of record-shattering heat, droughts, floods and storms. Developed countries, with the most historical emissions, must take the lead on increasing grant based public funds to address this injustice. This money should be raised from innovative sources like taxes and levies on big polluting activities such as fossil fuels extraction. Without it, the climate crisis will deepen inequalities in and between countries, leaving the poorest and most vulnerable behind,” says Lubna Hawwa, leading Swedwatch’s work on climate justice.

Climate finance loans exacerbate debt

In 2009, developed nations pledged to mobilize $100 billion annually by 2020 for climate action in low- and middle-income countries, yet the goal was only met in 2022. Furthermore, 70% of the climate finance flows between 2016 and 2022 came as loans rather than grants, with less than a quarter of the loans from multilateral development banks counted as concessional (see figure 1).

“This structure means they have to pay back most of the money with interest, adding to an already heavy debt burden. At the moment, the world’s poorest and most climate-vulnerable countries are spending over twice as much on debt payments to various creditors as they receive in climate funding”, says Lubna Hawwa, referring to an estimate by the International Institute for Environment and Development.


Public climate funding in 2016-2022 divided by instrument

pie chart

Figure 1: O Loans: $324.9 billion  O Grants: $120.7 billion  O Equity: $11.1 billion  O Other: $3.4 billion

The instrument mix varied by provider type, with multilateral development banks favoring loans, with and the lion’s share being non-concessional, and multilateral climate funds and bilateral providers balancing loans and grants. Source: OECD

A critical funding gap for loss and damage

While the climate finance loans pile up debt, diverting critical funds away from domestic needs, there is a critical shortfall in funding for adaptation efforts. Loss and damage alone are expected to cost low- and middle-income countries up to $580 billion annually by 2030, further stressing their economies.  

Areas in the low- and middle-income countries facing unsustainable development — such as resource extraction and economic exploitation with persisting gender and social inequity — bear the greatest risks. Indigenous Peoples and local communities, whose livelihoods often depend on vulnerable sectors like agriculture and fishing, are especially affected.

Inequitable renewable energy investments

An additional aspect of climate finance injustice lies in the distribution of renewable energy investments. While renewable investments are finally outpacing fossil fuels, most remains concentrated in advanced economies and China. Moreover, renewables projects in low- and middle-income countries frequently lack adequate human rights safeguard and fail to provide local communities with affordable energy access or job opportunities, thus deepening inequality rather than addressing it (an issue repeatedly raised by Swedwatch and partners at previous negotiations and which will soon be explored in a forthcoming study).

“This leaves the majority of the global population, without the support they need for a clean and just energy transition. This unequal distribution is not only unjust but threatens the global goal of limiting temperature rise to 1.5 degrees”, says Lubna Hawwa.  

Swedwatch will be monitoring the COP29 negotiations closely, with a particular focus on a just climate finance goal. Stay tuned for updates on our social media channels.


 

The climate funding divide in figures – vulnerable groups left behind

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are not receiving fair funding, with only 18% and 3% share of the total climate finance in 2022

The 10 most fragile states receive less than 1% of total climate adaptation flows, despite their heightened vulnerability.

Indigenous Peoples’ land tenure and forest management receive less than 11% of international climate finance

Small-scale farmers and rural communities receive just 2% of international public climate finance

Gender-responsive climate initiatives are underfunded, with only 0.01% of global finance supporting projects that address both climate and women’s rights.

Locally-led climate actions remain neglected, receiving less than 10% of climate finance 

This structure means low- and middle income-countries have to pay back most of the money with interest, adding to the already heavy debt burden. /Lubna Hawwa, Swedwatch

Swedwatch’s expectations on Sweden and the EU at COP29

As part of CONCORD’s working group on climate and environment justice, Swedwatch has provided input to the Swedish delegations, calling on Sweden and EU to:
1. Finance for the most affected groups and countries.
2. Cut emissions and put an end to fossil fuels.
3. Step up adaptation.
4. Inclusive decision-making and broad participation.

Read the joint statement👇🏼.

cop29-sve

Contact person

Lubna
Lubna Hawwa, Programme Officer

lubna@swedwatch.org
 +46(0)72 224 48 54

 

 

This website uses cookies

Cookies consist of small text files. They contain data that is stored on your device. To enable us to place certain types of cookies we need to obtain your consent. At SWEDWATCH, corp. ID no. 802415-4737, we use the following kinds of cookies. To read more about which cookies we use and storage times, click here to access our cookies policy.

Manage your cookie-settings

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies are cookies that must be placed for basic functions to work on the website. Basic functions are, for example, cookies which are needed so that you can use menus on the website and navigate on the site.

Functional cookies

Functional cookies need to be placed on the website in order for it to perform as you would expect. For example, so that it recognizes which language you prefer, whether or not you are logged in, to keep the website secure, remember login details or to be able to sort products on the website according to your preferences.

Cookies for statistics

For us to measure your interactions with the website, we place cookies in order to keep statistics. These cookies anonymize personal data.

Personalization cookies

In order to provide a better experiance we place cookies for your preferances

Cookies for ad-tracking

To enable us to offer better service and experience, we place cookies so that we can provide relevant advertising. Another aim of this processing is to enable us to promote products or services, provide customized offers or provide recommendations based on what you have purchased in the past.

Ad measurement user cookies

In order to show relevant ads we place cookies to tailor ads for you

Personalized ads cookies

To show relevant and personal ads we place cookies to provide unique offers that are tailored to your user data